Blog
Insights
The Complete Guide to AI Relations
The Complete Guide to AI Relations, or "How to Convince AI Talk About Your Brand." AI models are increasingly influential in the customer journey. AI Relations is the strategy to convince them to refer your brand over competitors.

Keller Maloney
Unusual - Founder
Oct 6, 2025
The Complete Guide to AI Relations
AI Relations is the discipline of earning trust, inclusion, and favorable framing from AI assistants (ChatGPT, Copilot, Perplexity, Gemini) so they confidently cite your content and, in practice, refer you to their users. Think of it as public relations for models: you build a body of evidence, place corroboration on trusted third parties, and maintain it so assistants prefer you by default. PR firms are beginning to formalize this approach—for example, Axia PR describes how to “earn your way into Google’s AI-generated answers,” treating AI visibility as a credibility and evidence problem, not a rank hack. (axiapr.com)
Why AI Relations (and Why Now)
Assistants synthesize from multiple sources, weigh credibility, and present a single helpful answer. You don’t “rank” in a chat; you’re selected as evidence. Generative engines increasingly lean on retrieval from the open web (e.g., Microsoft Copilot grounds answers with Bing’s index), so brands with clear, citable, and corroborated reference content are surfaced more often. (Microsoft Support)
How Models Evaluate Brands (in Practice)
Models behave more like analysts than classic rankers: they retrieve, compare, and reconcile before answering. Research on “generative engines” (GEO) frames this shift from links to synthesis: engines assemble answers by aggregating and summarizing cross-source evidence, rewarding clarity, consistency, and coverage. (arXiv)
What that means for you:
Definition-first pages with unambiguous claims are easier to cite.
Stable URLs, explicit limitations, tables, and visible changelogs reduce ambiguity.
Third-party corroboration increases confidence that your facts are “safe” to repeat.
Read next: How LLMs Evaluate Brands (signals, sources, pitfalls).
The Core of AI Relations: Your Open-Web Canon
Your canon is an AI-friendly company wiki: a neutral, citation-ready corpus that answers one intent per URL across product, pricing, security, integrations, comparisons, and FAQs. It should be HTML-first (fast, minimal JS), use stable slugs, and expose change history. This is the single source of truth assistants can quote verbatim.
Read next: Build an AI Company Wiki (IA, archetypes, governance).
Building AI Brand Authority
Authority is earned when your first-party canon is consistent and corroborated off-site. Treat this like PR: place concise confirmations of key claims on sources assistants already surface—standards bodies, reputable trade pubs, moderated docs ecosystems, and respected directories. Axia PR’s framing—earning inclusion in AI answers via quality sources—matches this posture. (axiapr.com)
Read next: Building AI Brand Authority (the authority stack and distribution paths).
Engineering the AI Referral Engine
Citations become pipeline when your canon pages include bridges to the next step: definition + decision table above the fold, “Compare vs X,” Pricing & Eligibility, Security review packs, and “Talk to an expert.” Use crawlable links (not JS-only buttons) so both models and humans can traverse the path.
Read next: The AI Referral Engine (mapping prompts → pages → actions).
Where AEO/GEO Fits
Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) bundle useful hygiene—clear FAQs, sensible schema, and structured, quotable content—but they’re subsets of AI Relations. The goal isn’t to “rank” for a fixed snippet; it’s to become the safest evidence a model can use across countless prompts and versions. Industry explainers define AEO as optimizing to be the delivered answer, and academic work on GEO highlights how generative engines synthesize from credible sources—both align with, but do not replace, a broader AI Relations program. (CXL)
Content Archetypes Models Prefer
Product Overviews: what it is, who it’s for, capabilities, limits, examples.
Pricing & Eligibility: plan matrix, inclusions/exclusions, edge cases, terms.
Security & Compliance: controls, certifications, subprocessors, data flows.
Integrations: supported versions, setup steps, constraints, sample payloads.
Comparisons: criteria-first tables and neutral language, with sources.
Single-question FAQs: one intent per URL; definition and short answer first.
Each page should end with references and a changelog.
Technical Standards That Matter
HTML-first rendering; content is legible with JS disabled.
Stable slugs and canonical tags; one concept → one URL.
JSON-LD that mirrors on-page facts (Article, FAQ, HowTo, CaseStudy).
Visible “last updated” and public “What’s new” roll-ups.
Internal links that reflect real next steps (pricing, compare, security, talk to sales).
These are not “tricks”—they’re scaffolding that helps retrieval layers and assistants parse, reconcile, and trust your pages.
Third-Party Evidence Placement
Prioritize sources assistants and search surfaces already elevate:
Standards and associations.
High-authority trade publications and methodical explainers.
Well-moderated developer/docs ecosystems (READMEs, specs).
Reputable directories or marketplaces with structured fields.
Place concise confirmations that match your canon (numbers, terms, definitions), and link back to your canonical URL. This mirrors traditional PR logic—win credible coverage to shape the record models see. Axia PR’s guidance explicitly focuses on getting credible sources surfaced in AI answers, reinforcing this approach. (axiapr.com)
Operating Model: From Campaigns to Canon
From campaigns to canon: campaigns spike attention; canon sustains inclusion.
From secrecy to legibility: make claims, pricing, and guarantees clear; ambiguity is punished.
From hacks to hygiene: prompt “SEO” and clever schema are fragile; reference clarity is durable.
From keywords to domains: prompt space is effectively infinite; cover domains comprehensively.
From clicks to referrals: assistants may paraphrase rather than link; design bridges that still convert.
Governance & Upkeep
Assign owners by archetype (PM for product, Finance/RevOps for pricing, Security for compliance).
Set SLAs (e.g., pricing monthly; security quarterly; comparisons on releases).
Resolve contradictions across site/blog/PDFs; add HTML twins for important PDFs.
Keep a public changelog and expose
lastmod
in sitemaps to accelerate recrawl.
Measurement (PR-Style Triangulation, Not Rank Watching)
AI influence rarely shows up as a tidy referral click. Measure it the way comms teams measure coverage:
Inclusion: presence in assistant answers (links shown when available; where not, qualitative sampling of answers for brand mentions and framing).
Framing: how the brand is described (benefits, caveats, categories) across assistants.
Availability & freshness: signs that crawlers/indexers are seeing updates (index coverage, recrawl cadence, cache dates).
Correlated demand: movements in branded search, direct visits to canonical URLs after relevant industry news or publication placements, and sales notes (“Found via Copilot/ChatGPT/Perplexity”).
Attribution by triangulation: combine qualitative answer sampling, crawl/freshness diagnostics, and downstream behavior to infer lift—more like media relations than last-click analytics. PR practitioners are explicitly recommending this style of AI visibility tracking. (axiapr.com)
Platform Notes (Just Enough to Be Practical)
Copilot: Grounds on Bing and summarizes across the web; clean, indexable canon often shows up here first. (Microsoft Support)
Perplexity: Citation-forward; it routinely shows sources, so tidy references and concise, quotable sections help. (G2 Learn Hub)
ChatGPT/Gemini: Links are less consistent unless browsing or specific modes are used; still, they synthesize from the open web and benefit from the same canon and corroboration patterns. (General behavior; confirm per mode.)
What Good Looks Like
Your site reads like a specification plus field guide.
Third parties restate your claims accurately.
Assistants name or cite you for core use cases—even when users don’t click a citation.
Sales hears “the AI suggested you” with growing regularity.
Getting Started (30/60/90)
Days 1–30: Map top 20 buyer questions; ship five canonical pages (product, pricing, security, integration, comparison) with bridges, schema aligned to facts, and visible changelogs.
Days 31–60: Add 10 intents; place corroboration on 4–6 authoritative third-party surfaces that already rank or get cited; resolve contradictions; add HTML twins for key PDFs.
Days 61–90: Expand canon; prune duplicates; publish a public “What’s New”; begin monthly qualitative answer sampling across assistants and correlate with branded demand and direct landings.
Bottom Line
AI Relations builds trust with AI models—evidence creation, placement, and upkeep so assistants can safely choose you. Treat models like influential editors with infinite prompt space: make your canon the easiest, safest way to help their users, and they’ll keep sending those users your way.